https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110198
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Benjamin Priour from comment #2) > Yes sorry for the regression. I confirmed it myself too on x86_64-linux-gnu. > I wrote a fix immediately yesterday, and I am currently regtesting it. > > It is promising as I quickly ran the test only for the analyzer test cases, > all of them now are back to their expected behavior. > > I'm sending the patch as soon as the regtesting finishes, so probably > tomorrow evening, as my keys on the compiler farm are not yet synced. Any news on this? I don't see anything posted to gcc-patches@ later than 2023-06-09. If you have trouble testing the patch that you mention, please send it anyway with a message mentioning your troubles.
