https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86277

--- Comment #24 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #23)
> 
> This regresses on pr108065.f90 (that's a few extra analyzer warnings),
> and on pr69955.f90 (that's one extra __builtin_malloc).

This removes the regressions.  Not fully retested again.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
index 1c7ea900ea1..7ae7eacca0b 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ gfc_trans_allocate_array_storage (stmtblock_t * pre,
stmtblock_t * post,

   desc = info->descriptor;
   info->offset = gfc_index_zero_node;
-  if (size == NULL_TREE || integer_zerop (size))
+  if (size == NULL_TREE || (dynamic && integer_zerop (size)))
     {
       /* A callee allocated array.  */
       gfc_conv_descriptor_data_set (pre, desc, null_pointer_node);

Reply via email to