https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86277
--- Comment #24 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #23) > > This regresses on pr108065.f90 (that's a few extra analyzer warnings), > and on pr69955.f90 (that's one extra __builtin_malloc). This removes the regressions. Not fully retested again. diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc index 1c7ea900ea1..7ae7eacca0b 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc @@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ gfc_trans_allocate_array_storage (stmtblock_t * pre, stmtblock_t * post, desc = info->descriptor; info->offset = gfc_index_zero_node; - if (size == NULL_TREE || integer_zerop (size)) + if (size == NULL_TREE || (dynamic && integer_zerop (size))) { /* A callee allocated array. */ gfc_conv_descriptor_data_set (pre, desc, null_pointer_node);