https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110082
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sebastian.huber@embedded-br
| |ains.de
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sebastian was also working in this area. Note that when you do it as proposed
the code will appear as having no coverage (the counters will be allocated at
the host side but nothing will increment them).
I suppose the very same issue exists for -fprofile-generate/use then where
this will then cause the offload code to be optimized for size because
it's cold (unless you use -fprofile-partial-training)?
