https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110010
Bug ID: 110010 Summary: (a>>N) != (b>>N) is not optimized to (a^b) >= (1<<N) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Take: ``` #define N 5 unsigned f(unsigned a, unsigned b) { return (a>>N) != (b>>N); } ``` This could be optimized down to just `return (a^b) <= (1<<N)`. This shows up in the testsuite as a pr94718-5.c failure when you add the following 2 match patterns: (simplify (negate (convert (lt @0 integer_zerop))) (if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))) (with { tree type_unsigned = unsigned_type_for (TREE_TYPE (@0)); } (if (types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@0)) || types_match (type_unsigned, type)) (convert (rshift @0 { build_int_cst (integer_type_node, element_precision (type) - 1); })))))) (simplify (convert (lt @0 integer_zerop)) (if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))) (with { tree type_unsigned = unsigned_type_for (TREE_TYPE (@0)); } (if (types_match (type, TREE_TYPE (@0)) || types_match (type_unsigned, type)) (convert (rshift (convert:type_unsigned @0) { build_int_cst (integer_type_node, element_precision (type) - 1); }))))))