https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109991
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to igk from comment #3) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > > Dup of bug 98675. > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 98675 *** > > Thanks for looking into this. I haven't quite understood though. Let me reword of what is going on and why it is still is a dup. So the constexpr should be ignored because it is undefined code. But since GCC does not detect the undefineness yet (this is what PR 98675 is about), GCC decides that it is still a constexpr and evaluates it at compile time and removes the ability for the sanitizer to detect the undefinedness at runtime.
