https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
--- Comment #52 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14) > (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #13) > > https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/i386-ABI/-/issues/5 to request such an ABI > > for 32-bit x86. I don't know if there are other psABIs with public issue > > trackers where such issues can be filed (but we'll need some sensible > > default anyway for architectures where we can't get an ABI properly > > specified in an upstream-maintained ABI document). > > ia32 psABI will follow x86-64 psABI. Is it a good idea to use 64-bit limbs and 64-bit alignment for the ia32 ABI? I mean, it is fine to use that _BitInt(N) for N 33..64 has size/alignment/passing of long long, but wonder if for N > 64 the ABI shouldn't use 32-bit limbs, 32-bit alignments and passing as struct containing the 32-bit limbs.
