https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109891
Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Oops, if I'd typed PEDASSERT not PEDANTIC, it would be a deliberate choice
> ;-)
>
> Yes, I think PEDASSERT fits better, based on the documented meaning of it
> (which even mentions the std::string((const char*)nullptr) case):
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/debug_mode_semantics.html
Ccan we add a "pednonnull" attribute or something to produce a -Wnonnull
warning like the nonnull attribute but w/o affecting code generation as well?
I remember we've discussed "adding nonnull attribute for
basic_ostream::operator<<" and the idea was rejected because the nonnull
attribute would throw away the null pointer check.
