https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is this really a 12 regression? I think it's failed that way for some time when
using the old ABI, it's just that nobody except me tests it that way :-)

I think it was fixed on trunk by r13-4080-g2b7f0378b915a6 and backported as
r12-9301-g0970eafdc61d75

Reply via email to