https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109774
Bug ID: 109774
Summary: Spurious dangling reference warning in GCC 13 -
another variant
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: minty.bobby at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 55021
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55021&action=edit
the function get() gives a spurious warning, but the very similar function
get2() does not
Similar to some of the other bug reports involving the new dangling reference
warning, but here we have 2 very similar functions, and only one gives the
warning. Perhaps there is scope to tweak the heuristics to improve this case?
In the attached file, the templated function get() gives a spurious warning,
but the very similar but non-template function get2() does not.
Note the reference passed in is of a different type to the reference that is
returned - I don't feel there should be confusion between them?
