https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109691
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > gcc.dg/pr81192.c might need a similar thing now too but I am not 100% sure. > pr81192.c should really be a Gimple testcase but gimple testcases were not > around when the testcase was added. It is going to need to be a gimple testcase. The testcase has become too fragile otherwise; it already has gone through a few -fno-* -fdisable-* options already too.
