https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109602
Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Romain Geissler from comment #5)
> Hi,
>
> My intention was to try to raise upstream an issue that people packaging gcc
> may hit in some cases. Gentoo has such a patch, but I also have a similar
> one on my side since couple of years, it's only yesterday that I discovered
> Gentoo had one too (and Alpine Linux). I am not a user of Gentoo nor Alpine
> Linux myself, I just also package my own gcc.
>
> So I apologize to the Gentoo and Gcc communities if I offended anyone by
> opening this bug report, that was not the intention.
no worries, I doubt anyone took offense. we (Gentoo) try to work as closely as
possible with upstream GCC, so usually a patch being on our end only means that
nobody reworked it to be upstreamable. if in doubt, you can email
toolch...@gentoo.org - we'd be happy to answer.
in this instance, the 'fix' we use is not applicable in the general case, since
it doesn't solve the general problem of building a downgraded gcc, so we never
upstreamed it.
PS: the general issue is reported, marking as dupe
have a lovely day!
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105688 ***
