https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106888

--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Comment on attachment 54905
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54905
proposed patch

So that's a subset of what we've done.  We initially thought that was going to
be enough to solve this class of problems.   But it's actually deeper than just
having a zero_extension variant of this pattern. 

I'll officially submit the zero_extension pattern and the match.pd bits.  The
other pattern we wrote is fugly and I'd like to look at it one more time.

Reply via email to