https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109555
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to niXman from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > Note branchless might be worse. > > really? > could you explain please? Yes cache misses. That is the second load might miss the cache. Plus the non reduced case will most likely have a branch on the result so in the end, it would just do unnecessary things if it is different. > > > > > Anyways there is a duplicate of this bug > > already. I think I filed it. > > thank you!
