https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- >'g++-13 -O2 -Wall -c ArithmeticSubtermGeneralization.ii' is enough to >reproduce. Interesting because it was not for me, but I noticed that removing all of the lines that begin with "#" is able to reproduce without any options only. Anyways my current reproducing script is: ``` if !(~/upstream-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.0.1/cc1plus -std=c++14 -fno-checking -quiet -Wfatal-errors $1 >& file1.out); then exit 1 fi if !(~/upstream-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.0.1/cc1plus -std=c++14 -quiet -Wfatal-errors $1 >& file.out); then if grep "hashtab_chk_error" file.out >&/dev/null; then exit 0 fi exit 1 fi if !(~/upstream-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.0.1/cc1plus -std=c++14 -march=znver3 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -quiet -Wfatal-errors $1 >& file1.out); then if grep "hashtab_chk_error" file1.out >&/dev/null; then exit 0 fi exit 1 fi ``` Yes it is more complex than a standard one would be because I want to reduce it to be a valid testcase (the first run of cc1plus) and then I noticed sometimes it reproduces with slightly different options so test with those. Hopefully the -fno-checking is enough to force not checking hashtable checking ...