https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #4) > But this is not so much about code bloat, we see 3.5% additional dynamic > icount on qemu which will affect perf even if we didn't care about code size > at all. Again dynamic icount increase does not always equals worse performance; especially when it comes to loading from memory. It is a much more complex equation depending on the cache and such. Now we should be able to form these constants better in the first place too.
