https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> PR84849 seems related, especially the comment #5 testcase from ensadc:
>
> template<class>
> struct in_place_type_t { explicit in_place_type_t() = default; };
>
> struct A { };
>
> int f(A);
> int f(in_place_type_t<A>);
>
> int x = f({});
Oops, this testcase from PR84849 might be strictly speaking invalid and GCC
correct to reject as per
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102247#c2. Is this PR not invalid
for the same reason?
