https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109241
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4872e46e080c6695dfe1f9dc9db26b4703bc348c commit r13-6824-g4872e46e080c6695dfe1f9dc9db26b4703bc348c Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Wed Mar 22 16:11:47 2023 -0400 c++: local class in nested generic lambda [PR109241] In this testcase, the tree walk to look for bare parameter packs was confused by finding a type with no TREE_BINFO. But it should be fine that it's unset; we already checked for unexpanded packs at parse time. I also tried doing the partial instantiation of the local class, which is probably the long-term direction we want to go, but for stage 4 let's go with this safer change. PR c++/109241 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (find_parameter_packs_r): Handle null TREE_BINFO. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-local-class2.C: New test.