https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109008
--- Comment #47 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For the !MODE_HAS_INFINITIES, perhaps
--- gcc/range-op-float.cc.jj 2023-03-09 13:12:05.248873234 +0100
+++ gcc/range-op-float.cc 2023-03-09 14:21:51.959802517 +0100
@@ -2216,6 +2216,7 @@ float_widen_lhs_range (tree type, const
return ret;
REAL_VALUE_TYPE lb = lhs.lower_bound ();
REAL_VALUE_TYPE ub = lhs.upper_bound ();
+ bool lb_inf = false, ub_inf = false;
if (real_isfinite (&lb))
{
frange_nextafter (TYPE_MODE (type), lb, dconstninf);
@@ -2238,6 +2239,14 @@ float_widen_lhs_range (tree type, const
real_arithmetic (&tem, PLUS_EXPR, &lhs.lower_bound (), &lb);
real_arithmetic (&lb, RDIV_EXPR, &tem, &dconst2);
}
+ if (!MODE_HAS_INFINITIES (TYPE_MODE (type))
+ && frange_val_is_min (lhs.lower_bound (), type))
+ {
+ /* If type doesn't have infinities, then the minimum acts
+ as kind of infinity. Turn it into a true infinity. */
+ real_inf (&lb, true);
+ lb_inf = true;
+ }
}
if (real_isfinite (&ub))
{
@@ -2256,6 +2265,14 @@ float_widen_lhs_range (tree type, const
real_arithmetic (&tem, PLUS_EXPR, &lhs.upper_bound (), &ub);
real_arithmetic (&ub, RDIV_EXPR, &tem, &dconst2);
}
+ if (!MODE_HAS_INFINITIES (TYPE_MODE (type))
+ && frange_val_is_max (lhs.upper_bound (), type))
+ {
+ /* If type doesn't have infinities, then the maximum acts
+ as kind of infinity. Turn it into a true infinity. */
+ real_inf (&ub, false);
+ ub_inf = true;
+ }
}
/* Temporarily disable -ffinite-math-only, so that frange::set doesn't
reduce the range back to real_min_representable (type) as lower bound
@@ -2266,6 +2283,15 @@ float_widen_lhs_range (tree type, const
ret.clear_nan ();
ret.union_ (lhs);
flag_finite_math_only = save_flag_finite_math_only;
+ if (lb_inf || ub_inf)
+ {
+ if (ret.kind () == VR_VARYING)
+ ret.m_kind = VR_RANGE;
+ if (lb_inf)
+ ret.m_min = lb;
+ if (ub_inf)
+ ret.m_max = ub;
+ }
return ret;
}
except that the members are private and so the above will not compile. We'd
need some kind of set_unsafe or whatever that would allow to override those
even when it is not canonical.
But given that I'm not sure if even the forward operations result in correct
ranges around these non-infinity "infinities", doing something with it is
perhaps premature.
