https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35412
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to dingd from comment #10) > I wonder what's the status of this bug. It has been 15 years. It still is a bug. > > As far as I know, Clang doesn't have this bug, so it should not be > impossible to implement. Yes clang/LLVM does not have this bug because the internals of them and GCC are way different. > > And, does -fsantize=undefined really provides the same functionality of this > switch? I have always assumed that santizers are not to be used in > production, right? See PR 101521 for some ideas of how to implement this using the same infrastructure as -fsantize=undefined .
