https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108315
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #14) > Are you guys really sure you want to blame the user here, I apologise if this hasn't been a nice experience for you. I'm not blaming anyone, least of all the user. That is not what bugzilla is for anyway. The goal here is to work together on improving the compiler. I marked the bug as RESOLVED INVALID because a) there is nothing left to be done to resolve this PR, and b) that is because there never was anything to be done (in GCC!) in the first place. If this is not correct, please add some info clarifying that, and reopen the PR? > considering that > all linkers, including the BFD linker, initially misinterpreted the ABI the > same way? It wasn't implemented correctly there either, yes. That does not necessarily mean the ABI was misinterpreted, but sure, that could be. In either case that has nothing to do with GCC.
