https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108993
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm,
I noticed that since GCC 7 with -std=c++17, the b.x is not initialized at all.
So the question I have is there a difference between C++ standards here?
Note the issue is we call Base's constructor after doing the zero
initialization and the Base's constructor has a clobber in it which I think is
correct.
This is all front-end generation and not exactly related to the optimizations
directly.
