https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103370
--- Comment #9 from Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The glibc build failure has done away and come back at least once since my
previous comment. It came back (I think the most recent time) with
commit 4fa25a7eb322f0a003c1eb15680c71ece345e01e
Author: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
AuthorDate: Mon Jan 24 15:45:38 2022 +0100
Commit: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
CommitDate: Wed Nov 30 14:03:43 2022 +0100
Improve profile handling in switch lowering.
PR tree-optimization/101301
PR tree-optimization/103680
though that's almost surely just exposing a back-end bug. However, the reduced
test here gave a different assembler error
/tmp/cc40cNSh.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cc40cNSh.s:320: Error: syntax error -- statement `lea
(.LC0@GOT+3,%a5),%a0' ignored
/tmp/cc40cNSh.s:328: Error: syntax error -- statement `lea
(.LC1@GOT+3,%a5),%a2' ignored
both before and after that commit (different register numbers and .s line
numbers before versus after). Despite the different error messages from the
reduced test and building glibc, they are still likely to be the same bug in
the m68k back end.
