https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108626
--- Comment #5 from Marat Radchenko <marat at slonopotamus dot org> --- So, does "String literals, and compound literals with const-qualified types, need not designate distinct objects." apply here or not? If not, how does the case where it applies look like? https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/compound_literal explicitly says (though I do understand this is not a 100% reliable source): Compound literals of const-qualified character or wide character array types may share storage with string literals. ---- (const char []){"abc"} == "abc" // might be 1 or 0, implementation-defined ---- Comparison with string literals isn't actually implementation-defined but instead unspecified behavior, but the point here is that they think it is possible memory is shared.
