https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108099
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)> > Those are all correct. They don't use the __int128_t typedef, only the > keyword. Then I wonder how someone got the reduced testcase from PR 108613 which used __int128_t. Did they have a -D__int128=__int128_t somewhere?
