https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108498
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The only thing is memcpy could be broken ... I can't find anything wrong with the generated code. 100007cc: 38 a0 00 44 li r5,68 ... 100007d8: 3c 00 02 00 lis r0,512 100007dc: 60 00 ff 03 ori r0,r0,65283 100007e0: 78 00 07 c6 sldi r0,r0,32 100007e4: 64 00 00 01 oris r0,r0,1 100007e8: 60 00 02 03 ori r0,r0,515 ... 100007fc: 38 81 00 74 addi r4,r1,116 ... 1000080c: 7c 7f 1b 78 mr r31,r3 ... 10000818: f8 01 00 74 std r0,116(r1) ... 1000082c: 4b ff fd 15 bl 10000540 <0000003b.plt_call.memcpy@@GLIBC_2.3> ... On the main side: addi %r3,%r1,116 ld %r9,-28688(%r13) std %r9,184(%r1) li %r9,0 bl emit_test lwz %r4,124(%r1)