https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345

--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As to comment#7 I agree, for some qsort comparators we probably do not care if
the outcome is really sorted in the end and the issue with different qsort
implementations producing differently sorted results is gone.

Maybe for those we should have a separately named entry, skipping the
verification?

gcc_heuristic_sort_nocheck ()?

Reply via email to