https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108396
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2) > Yes, it's a typo, which makes the macro definition change to: > > #define vec_vsubcuqP __builtin_vec_vsubcuq Yup. > Unfortunately we don't have the testing coverage in testsuite for the > expected name vec_vsubcuq (in rs6000-vecdefines.h): Is it hard to add one for all (or many) of the legacy builtins? Do we want to test more than just if it compiles?
