[Bug tree-optimization/107608] [13 Regression] Failure on fold-overflow-1.c and pr95115.c

[aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608

Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #54224|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #26 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 54253
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54253&action=edit
proposed patch

So where are we on this?  Do we want to do something like this for this
release, or something else entirely?

This is a variation of the previous patch that instead of setting varying,
avoids the singleton by returning:

[INF, INF]   => [+MAX, +INF]
[-INF, -INF] => [-INF, -MIN]