https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108261
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #14) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #12) > > > (In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #11) > > > > > when a module has the same name but a different interface are the > > > > symbols distinct (i.e. mangled differently)? > > > > > > > > no. So, as you say, the ordering of the static link works fine. > > What if we made them mangle differently? > That might solve a bunch of problems in one go. or even less complex than that... IsoSystem, PimSystem, MinSystem .. etc and have the FE emit that (since it knows the prevailing dialect)? (I presume it's not that simple.. of course)
