https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108218
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=108219
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Steven Sun from comment #7)
> I got one simple idea as a workaround. I do not have the resources to do the
> tests.
FWIW that seems like the right idea, but it regresses
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2392.C:
$ cat gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2392.C
// DR 2392
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
template <class T = void>
constexpr int
foo ()
{
T t;
return 1;
}
using V = decltype (new int[foo ()]);
$ gcc gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2392.C
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2392.C: In instantiation of ‘constexpr int foo()
[with T = void]’:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2392.C:12:33: required from here
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2392.C:8:5: error: variable or field ‘t’ declared
void
8 | T t;
| ^
