https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108310
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=103210
Blocks| |44209
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Kinda related to bug 103210, IMO, in that I've uncovered both of them by
building my fork of gdb with gcc: https://github.com/cooljeanius/apple-gdb-1824
And, they're also both examples of places where warnings in gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
have a "0" for the second argument where they really ought to have an option
name instead, as per bug 44209.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
[Bug 44209] [meta-bug] Some warnings are not linked to diagnostics options
