https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97398
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |89180, 87403
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Ulrich Windl from comment #3)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> > would this go under one of the existing -Wunused flags, or a new one?
>
> I think it's a case of being an unused value set to a variable in general,
> but more specifically it's setting a value more than once before possibly
> being used (which is the case in my code). SO IMHO the question is whether
> setting a variable more than once without being read in between is a special
> case of setting a variable value without using it.
Hm... guess I'll put this under both the "Wunused" and "new-warning" meta-bugs,
and then let whoever implements it decide where it fits better...
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
[Bug 87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180
[Bug 89180] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings
