https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100427
--- Comment #13 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #12) > (In reply to nightstrike from comment #10) > > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #5) > > > I think the copy to bin behavior should be removed. It should be just like > > > normal linux distribution. 64 bit dlls in lib. 32 bit dlls in lib32. > > > > This is a feature of Windows. Windows will find dlls in PATH, not in lib > > directories. > > > > Multilib toolchains do face issues with versioned runtime libraries. You > > can try configuring with --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs. Generally > > speaking, it's easier to just build two separate toolchains than to try > > getting multilib to work. I made the mistake of pushing for multilib to be > > enabled by default, and we never got it working quite well. > > > > Anyway, I don't think this is a bug as stated. > > yes this is a bug. because I can fix it easily. > > You are wrong. Because cross toolchain for multilib would put DLLs in the > lib and lib32, not bin https://github.com/cppfastio/fast_io/blob/master/examples/0009.filesystem/gccx86canadianfix.cc
