https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105730
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this should solve the problem:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/compatibility-condvar.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/compatibility-condvar.cc
@@ -67,6 +67,22 @@ _GLIBCXX_END_NAMESPACE_VERSION
&& defined(_GLIBCXX_HAVE_SYMVER_SYMBOL_RENAMING_RUNTIME_SUPPORT)
namespace __gnu_cxx _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
{
+namespace
+{
+ std::__condvar std::condition_variable::* __base_member;
+
+ template<std::__condvar std::condition_variable::*X>
+ struct cracker
+ {
+ static std::__condvar std::condition_variable::* value;
+ };
+ template<std::__condvar std::condition_variable::*X>
+ std::__condvar std::condition_variable::*
+ cracker<X>::value = __base_member = X;
+
+ template class cracker<&std::condition_variable::_M_cond>;
+}
+
struct __nothrow_wait_cv : std::condition_variable
{
void wait(std::unique_lock<std::mutex>&) noexcept;
@@ -76,7 +92,7 @@ __attribute__((used))
void
__nothrow_wait_cv::wait(std::unique_lock<std::mutex>& lock) noexcept
{
- this->condition_variable::wait(lock);
+ (this->*__base_member).wait(*lock.mutex());
}
} // namespace __gnu_cxx
