https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107551
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska <mar...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d71b20fc30965ba8326ad9363d0aca9d61eb4ed3 commit r13-4581-gd71b20fc30965ba8326ad9363d0aca9d61eb4ed3 Author: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> Date: Fri Nov 25 13:05:56 2022 +0100 i386: fix assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64") >= 0) Similar story as PR103661, we again return a negative number for __builtin_cpu_supports: Documentation says: int __builtin_cpu_supports(const char *feature) This function returns a positive integer if the run-time CPU supports feature and returns 0 otherwise. while we return -2147483648. Moreover, I noticed "x86-64" is not a valid option for __builtin_cpu_is, but for __builtin_cpu_supports. PR target/107551 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/i386/i386-builtins.cc (fold_builtin_cpu): Use same path as for PR103661. * doc/extend.texi: Fix "x86-64" use. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c: Add more checks.