https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107979
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2022-12-05
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No need to ignore it, this should work:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/names.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/names.cc
@@ -241,6 +241,11 @@
#undef y
#endif
+#if defined __GLIBC_PREREQ && ! __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 19)
+// Glibc defines this prior to 2.19
+#undef __unused
+#endif
+
#if __has_include(<newlib.h>)
// newlib's <sys/cdefs.h> defines these as macros.
#undef __lockable
Interesting that the comment Andrew posted also mentions __block, because we
use that as a variable name in a few places. It hasn't failed so far :-)
