https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107950

--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I wonder why the linker complains?  Isn't this like
> 
> t.h
> 
> class X { foo (); bar (); baz (); };
> 
> and splitting the foo/bar/baz implementations to three TUs and then linking
> two of them partially?

I've just tried using -flto-partition=one and it hasn't helped me.

Reply via email to