https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107819
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #11) > Update: Steve Lionel thinks that no temporary is necessary, and testcase > z1.f90 > is non-conforming: > > https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/ELEMENTAL-subroutine- > and-dummy-with-VALUE-attribute/m-p/1432932 > > In this case the patch of comment#2 would be sufficient. I was about to suggest to push the check_variable value change down into gfc_check_fncall_dependency, to be more aggressive wrt temporary elimination. But if the test is not conforming, let's throw all that away.
