https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107672
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It looks like the code looks for a vector type even ... I'm going to test
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
index bc0ef136f19..b35b986889d 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
@@ -12195,9 +12195,15 @@ supportable_widening_operation (vec_info *vinfo,
intermediate_type
= vect_halve_mask_nunits (prev_type, intermediate_mode);
else
- intermediate_type
- = lang_hooks.types.type_for_mode (intermediate_mode,
- TYPE_UNSIGNED (prev_type));
+ {
+ gcc_assert (VECTOR_MODE_P (intermediate_mode));
+ tree intermediate_element_type
+ = lang_hooks.types.type_for_mode (GET_MODE_INNER
(intermediate_mode),
+ TYPE_UNSIGNED (prev_type));
+ intermediate_type
+ = build_vector_type_for_mode (intermediate_element_type,
+ intermediate_mode);
+ }
if (VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (intermediate_type)
&& VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (prev_type)
can you check if that helps the Java frontend here?
