https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107735

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I wonder if this is because doing 
> constexpr const int *v1 = &array[3];
> 
> is valid and well defined.

It's not, but &array.data()[3] is.

I agree that's probably the reason for the different diagnostics.

Reply via email to