https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107590

--- Comment #15 from Sergey Fedorov <vital.had at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> Oh yes there could be a bug here when the byte (lbarx/stbcx.) and half-word
> (lharx/sthcx.) instruction support was added (which was for Power8;
> r0-123873-g4b02c96265fb52).

There was some argument re appropriateness lwarx etc. ages ago here:
https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost//2005/04/83865.php
Though Peter Dimov said it is likely irrelevant.

> But that was 9 years ago.
> Is powerpc-darwin really coming back in style or something?

PPC is very much alive! :)
(Primarily thanks to Iain’s efforts with GCC – without a new GCC we could not
have done much. But yes, we have fixed some forever-broken stuff for PPC
recently, and process ongoing.)

Reply via email to