https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107590
--- Comment #15 from Sergey Fedorov <vital.had at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13) > Oh yes there could be a bug here when the byte (lbarx/stbcx.) and half-word > (lharx/sthcx.) instruction support was added (which was for Power8; > r0-123873-g4b02c96265fb52). There was some argument re appropriateness lwarx etc. ages ago here: https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost//2005/04/83865.php Though Peter Dimov said it is likely irrelevant. > But that was 9 years ago. > Is powerpc-darwin really coming back in style or something? PPC is very much alive! :) (Primarily thanks to Iain’s efforts with GCC – without a new GCC we could not have done much. But yes, we have fixed some forever-broken stuff for PPC recently, and process ongoing.)