https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107538
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> #define _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> #include <complex>
> #include <limits>
>
> int main()
> {
> double nan = std::numeric_limits<double>::quiet_NaN();
> std::pow(10, std::complex<double>(nan, 1));
Actually maybe the assertion is OK. This violates [complex.numbers] p3:
"If the result of a function is not mathematically defined or not in the range
of representable values for its type, the behavior is undefined."
10^(nan + 1i) is not mathematically defined, an assertion seems OK.
If we want to prevent the assertion here we could do:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/complex
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/complex
@@ -699,12 +699,19 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
&& !_GLIBCXX_FAST_MATH>::_S_do_it(__z);
}
+ template<typename _Tp>
+ inline complex<_Tp>
+ __polar(const _Tp& __rho, const _Tp& __theta)
+ { return complex<_Tp>(__rho * cos(__theta), __rho * sin(__theta)); }
+
template<typename _Tp>
inline complex<_Tp>
polar(const _Tp& __rho, const _Tp& __theta)
{
+ // _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS
+ // 2459. std::polar should require a non-negative rho
__glibcxx_assert( __rho >= 0 );
- return complex<_Tp>(__rho * cos(__theta), __rho * sin(__theta));
+ return std::__polar<_Tp>(__rho, __theta);
}
template<typename _Tp>
@@ -778,7 +785,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
template<typename _Tp>
inline complex<_Tp>
__complex_exp(const complex<_Tp>& __z)
- { return std::polar<_Tp>(exp(__z.real()), __z.imag()); }
+ { return std::__polar<_Tp>(exp(__z.real()), __z.imag()); }
#if _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX
inline __complex__ float
@@ -1038,7 +1045,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
return pow(__x.real(), __y);
complex<_Tp> __t = std::log(__x);
- return std::polar<_Tp>(exp(__y * __t.real()), __y * __t.imag());
+ return std::__polar<_Tp>(exp(__y * __t.real()), __y * __t.imag());
}
template<typename _Tp>
@@ -1075,8 +1082,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
inline complex<_Tp>
pow(const _Tp& __x, const complex<_Tp>& __y)
{
- return __x > _Tp() ? std::polar<_Tp>(pow(__x, __y.real()),
- __y.imag() * log(__x))
+ return __x > _Tp() ? std::__polar<_Tp>(pow(__x, __y.real()),
+ __y.imag() * log(__x))
: std::pow(complex<_Tp>(__x), __y);
}