https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107561
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > This probably boils down to the object size machinery ignoring [0, 0] (aka > not picking a convex hull of the range). The range implementation of all > these > passes should be using irange<> (but with wide_ints, not trees) instead of > doing their own thing. Amen. I've been saying that for years.