https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107441
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords| |wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2022-10-27
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed.
There is an inconsistency either in the generated code for the caller or
the callee:
integer(kind=4) testoptional (character(kind=1)[1:1] & restrict w,
integer(kind=4) x, integer(kind=8) _w, logical(kind=1) _x)
vs.
t = testoptional (&s, 0, 0, 1);
How does the ABI define the ordering of character length and presence flag?
