https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Steve,
what do you think about the following patch? Not yet fully regtested.
It should fix the issue much simpler by checking type compatibility:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc b/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc
index 6050359d521..f4052eb7042 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/symbol.cc
@@ -5139,6 +5141,9 @@ gfc_type_compatible (gfc_typespec *ts1, gfc_typespec
*ts2)
bool is_union1 = (ts1->type == BT_UNION);
bool is_union2 = (ts2->type == BT_UNION);
+ if (ts2->type == BT_BOZ)
+ return (ts1->type == BT_INTEGER || ts1->type == BT_REAL);
+
if (is_class1
&& ts1->u.derived->components
&& ((ts1->u.derived->attr.is_class
Do you have a testcase that exercises BT_INTEGER and BT_REAL here?
I thought that one of the pathes that reaches gfc_boz2int and gfc_boz2real
might need the above.
