https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107386

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Well, even though this warning is not correct, it can happen that one wants to
define "extended" enum values by multiplying the existing (implicit) values and
would be surprised that 0 * some_value == 0.

Reply via email to