https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107278
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan <ky4ct at arrl dot net> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Iirc there was a defect report against the c++ standard here and you should
> just foo instead of foo<T>
kd5eax@KY4CT CLANG64 ~
$ cat test.cpp
template<typename T>
class foo
{
foo<T>(foo<T> const&) = delete;
foo<T>(foo<T> const&&) = default;
};
int main()
{
return 0;
};
kd5eax@KY4CT CLANG64 ~
$ clang++ -std=c++20 test.cpp
kd5eax@KY4CT CLANG64 ~
$
kd5eax@KY4CT UCRT64 ~
$ g++ -std=c++2b test.cpp
test.cpp:4:22: error: expected ')' before 'const'
4 | foo<T>(foo<T> const&) = delete;
| ~ ^~~~~~
| )
test.cpp:5:22: error: expected ')' before 'const'
5 | foo<T>(foo<T> const&&) = default;
| ~ ^~~~~~
| )
kd5eax@KY4CT UCRT64 ~
$ g++ test.cpp
kd5eax@KY4CT UCRT64 ~
$
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Iirc there was a defect report against the c++ standard here and you should
> just foo instead of foo<T>
If that is the case, can you please link the defect report against the
standard?
