https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Indeed, the bogus expectation is eventually that s(2) gets the argument
register set up for the call to n(), but obviously that's misguided.
