[Bug tree-optimization/106513] [10 Regression] bswap pass misses that >>56 for signed types can be replicate the sign bit

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106513

--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
<rgue...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29ad829c93d530e75dee88d2550350c14fcaf8f6

commit r10-11038-g29ad829c93d530e75dee88d2550350c14fcaf8f6
Author: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
Date:   Wed Aug 10 15:45:22 2022 +0200

    tree-optimization/106513 - fix mistake in bswap symbolic number shifts

    This fixes a mistake in typing a local variable in the symbolic
    shift routine.

            PR tree-optimization/106513
            * gimple-ssa-store-merging.c (do_shift_rotate): Use uint64_t
            for head_marker.

            * gcc.dg/torture/pr106513.c: New testcase.

    (cherry picked from commit f675afa4eeac9910a2c085a95aa04d6d9f2fd8d6)