https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107051
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2022-09-27 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- With -O2 I see func_1: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc movl e(%rip), %eax testl %eax, %eax je .L2 .L3: jmp .L3 .p2align 4,,10 .p2align 3 .L2: movq g_284+8(%rip), %rax movq %rax, g_284(%rip) ret note that with -O1 we retain c = g_284[1]; c$f0_3 = g_284[1].f0; c.f0 = c$f0_3; g_284[0] = c; after GIMPLE optimization which possibly explains this compared to c = g_284[1]; g_284[0] = c; with -O2.